- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2116 RSA No. 1690 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1690 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SMT INDIRAMMA W/O LATE KOTESHWAR HATHWAR, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/A KALPAVA, KOTESHWAR VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. &APPELLANT [BY SRI. SRIKANTH V K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. SRI GAJENDRA RAO S/O LATE KOTESHWAR HATHWAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/A KOTESHWAR VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. 2. SRI. SUDHEENDRA RAO S/O LATE KOTESHWAR HATHWAR, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/A GAYATHRI NILAYA, DOOR NO. 105, 6TH BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE. &RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.04.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.43/2023 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2116 RSA No. 1690 of 2024 KUNDAPURA, AND SET ASIDE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 1ST DAY OF AGUSUT 2023, PASSED IN O.S.NO.92/1998 BY II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 4th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 33