SOUMEN KUMAR SADHUKHAN AND ORS. v. TAPAN KUMAR MAITY, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE KRISHNANAGAR EXSCISE DIVISION
CPAN/1833/2025 · 2026-02-27
Madhuresh Prasad, Supratim Bhattacharya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5075 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5075 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27th February, 2026 (D/L No.10) Ct. No.4 (SKB)
CPAN 1833 of 2025 In W.P.S.T.194 of 2024
Soumen Kumar Sadhukhan and others Versus Tapan Kumar Maity, Joint Commissioner of Excise, Krishnanagar Excise Division
Mr. Sankha Ghosh, Mr. Biswarup Nandy, Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah … for the applicants.
Mr. Arjun Ray Mukherjee, Mr. Subhendu Sengupta … for the alleged contemnor.
1. The learned counsel representing the alleged contemnor handed over two copies of the orders bearing number C-1843E and C-1844E both dated 12th February, 2026 issued by the Excise Commissioner, West Bengal and the Special Excise Commissioner, Human Resources, West Bengal respectively in support of his contention that the order passed in W.P.S.T.194 of 2024 is complied with. The order in C-1843E reads as follows:
“Sri Sadhukhan is reinstated, hence allowed to resume his duty at this present placed of posting and the period of suspension is to be treated on “Spend on Duty” in compliance of the said orders of the Hon’ble High Court.”
2
2. The assertion made by the learned State advocate based on these two orders are not in dispute.
3. The learned advocate for the applicants submits that the order has been complied with.
4. In view of such development, nothing survives in the contempt proceedings.
5. The same is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)