Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50746 (MAD)

D.ALAMELU v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/26036/2026 · 2026-07-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26036 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26036 of 2026 D.Alamelu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Villupuram District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.06.2026 seeking issuance of patta in the petitioner favour in respect of village natham survey No.129/1 measuring an extent of 270 square meters (Old Survey No.43/1) situated at Vallam Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ali Hassan Khan For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26036 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 02.06.2026 before the respondents seeking issuance of patta on her favour in respect of village Natham survey No.129/1 measuring an extent of 270 square meters (Old Survey No.43/1) situated at Vallam Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 02.06.2026 will be considered within a period of six weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the third respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26036 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Collector, Villupuram District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26036 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 26036 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis