Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010009152015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 536/2015 Between: 1. VEERABATHULA NIRMALA, KAKINADA, W/O. SRI RAJU OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O. DOOR NO.70-15-33/2B, SASTRI NAGAR GODARIGUNTA, KAKINADA - 533 005, E.G. DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD - 500 066 2. VEERABATHULA RAJU, S/O. SRI TATA RAO OCC: SERVICE R/O. V.K. RAYAPURAM - 533 434 SAMALKOT MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT 3. VEERABATHULA SURYAKANTHAM, W/O. SRI TATA RAO OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O, SATYAVARAPUPETA, V.K. RAYAPURAM - 533 434 SAMALKOT MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT 4. VEERABATHULA NAGOMI, D/O. SRI TATA RAO R/O. SATYAVARAPUPETA, V.K. RAYAPURAM - 533 434 SAMALKOT MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT 5. VEERABATHULA SWAMI BABU SYAMBABU, S/O. SRI TATA RAO, R/O. SATYAVARAPUPETA, V.K. RAYAPURAM - 533 434 SAMALKOT MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the Judgment made in Criminal Appeal No.390 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kakinada dated 31-12-2014 preferred against the Order made in DVC No.8 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the V Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada dated 05-08-2013 and set aside the same and pass such other further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA The Court made the following: HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.536 OF 2015 ORDER: Sri N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, submitted that both the parties have settled their issue out of Court and sought permission to withdraw this revision. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 10.07.2026 Vns/klk Whether the order is : ✓ Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No ✓ Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No