Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50708 (MAD)

SELVARAJ v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/26735/2026 · 2026-07-13

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26735 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26735 of 2026 Selvaraj S/o.Savuriannan, Palaiyur, Kurumbakooriputhur Village, Thadhavalli Madura, Tirupathur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tirupathur District, Tirupathur-635601. 2. The District Revenue Officer Office of the District Revenue Officer, Tirupathur District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondent to complete the enquiry and pass orders by considering the petitioners representation dated 24.04.2026 and pass any order or orders as this Honble court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.M.Santharam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt. counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26735 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.04.2026. 2. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 24.04.2026 before the 3rd respondent, requesting them to pass orders, for cancellation of patta, based on the enquiry conducted on 30.01.2026. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the 3rd respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26735 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.04.2026 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To 1. The District Collector Tirupathur District, Tirupathur-635601. 2. The District Revenue Officer Office of the District Revenue Officer, Tirupathur District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26735 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 26735 of 2026 13-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis