Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5070 (CHH)

CHHATTISGARH RAJYA GRAMIN BANK v. ASHWINI KUMAR KURRE

MCC/643/2024 · 2026-03-26

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14490 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 643 of 2024 1. Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Through Its Managing Director Cum Chairman, Head Office, Mahadev Ghat Road, Sunder Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Through Its Regional Manager, Regional Office First Floor, Vivek Complex, Sangam Gali, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. Branch Manager Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Branch Office, Sedam, District - Surguja (C.G.) (Sedam Incorrect Mentioned As Per Annexure P-1) ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Ashwini Kumar Kurre S/o. Late Preetam Kurre Aged About 59 Years R/o. Nawapara, Ambikapur Police Station - Gandhinagar, Tehsil - Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.). Through His Wife Namely Urmila Kurre, W/o. Ashwini Kumar Kurre, Aged About 19 Years, R/o. Nawapara, Ambikapur, Police Station - Gandhinagar, Tehsil - Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.), District - Surguja (Ambikapur) (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Manoj Pranjpe, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rishabh Gupa, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 27.03.2026 1. Present MCC has been filed by the applicants for modification of the MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.03.27 14:18:56 +0530 2 order dated 01.09.2022 passed by this Court in WP(S) No. 3864/2018 in view of that this Court while passing the impugned order dated 01.09.2022 has taken into consideration the order passed by this Court in WP(S) No. 2377 of 2018 in case of Sandeep Kumar Singh vs. Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank & Others decided on 27.03.2018. 2. It has been informed by both the parties that the said order passed in case of Sandeep Kumar Singh (Supra), the Hon’ble Division Bench has set aside the order dated 27.03.2018 and has directed to conclude the inquiry. 3. Since the foundation of the order passed by this Court has also been set aside by the Hon’ble Division Bench, therefore, I am of the view that the present MCC in not maintainable, however, since the Hon’ble Division Bench has set aside the order dated 27.03.2018 passed by this Court vide order dated 24.07.2025 passed in Writ Appeal No. 394/2025, liberty is granted to the applicants to take other remedies available to them including filing of writ appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Misc. Civil Case is disposed with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the applicants. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish