SMT. POONAM SHARMA DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAMAVTAR SHARMA, WIFE OF SHRI PAWAN SHARMA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/437/2026 · 2026-03-24
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5068 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5068 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12449] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 437/2026
1. Smt. Poonam Sharma Daughter of Shri Ramavtar Sharma, Wife of Shri Pawan Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.), At Present Resident of Flat No. A-307, Third Floor, 02 Bhk, Avni Home Society, Beelwa, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Pawan Sharma Son of Shri Tarachand, Aged About 21 Years, Resident of Naiyon Ka Mohalla, Dabgaon, PO Bhinchawa, District Nagaur (Raj.), At Present Resident Of Flat No. A-307, Third Floor, 02 Bhk, Avni Home Society, Beelwa, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent of Police, Nagaur, District Nagaur (Raj.)
4. S.H.O. Police Station Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.)
5. Dy. Commissioner of Police, Jaipur South Jaipur (Raj.)
6. S.H.O. Police Station Muhana Mandi, District Jaipur South, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Pawan Sharma Son of Shri Ramprasad Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.)
8. Sitaram Son of Shri Madan Lal Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.
9. Manoj Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Rameshwar Lal Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.)
10. Sunita Sharma Wife of Shri Sitaram Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.)
11. Deepak Sharma Son of Shri Nandlal Sharma, Aged About 52 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur
[2026:RJ-JP:12449] (2 of 3) [CRLW-437/2026] (Raj.)
12. Govind Sharma Son of Shri Ramavtar Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.)
13. Pankaj Sharma Son of Shri Ramprasad Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.)
14. Vikas Sharma Son of Shri Sitaram Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident of Huldhani, Post Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.K. Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 24/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.7 to 14 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Mandir Trust Regd. 71-72 IInd Floor Gakhle Market, Tis Hazari Courts Delhi on 24.02.2026 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Officer,
[2026:RJ-JP:12449] (3 of 3) [CRLW-437/2026] Chandni Chowk, District Old Delhi. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.7 to 14 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Badu, District Nagaur (Raj.) and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /354