Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5068 (JHR)

RAFIK ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/110/2026 · 2026-03-17

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:7492 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 110 of 2026 Rafik Ansari, Aged about 38 years, son of Md. Hannan Ansari, Resident of village & Post-Chhaila Pathar, P.S. Jama, District-Dumka. --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Inspector General of Police of Jharkhand, Santhal Pargana Division at Dumka, P.O. & P.S.-Dumka, District-Dumka 3. Superintendent of Police, Dumka, P.O. & P.S.-Dumka, District- Dumka 4. Officer In-Charge, Jama, P.O. & P.S.-Jama, District-Dumka 5. Investigating Officer, Jama, P.O. & P.S.-Jama, District-Dumka. --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the Respondents Mr. Yogesh Modi, A.C. to A.A.G.-IA --- 02 / 17.03.2026 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to A.A.G.-IA. 2. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the concerned respondents to properly investigate Jama P.S. Case No. 60/2025. 3. It has been alleged that the petitioner and his family members were assaulted by the accused persons which led to institution of Jama P.S. Case No. 60/2025. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that with respect to his grievance the respondent No.3 has already been approached by the petitioner by making a representation. 5. Be that as it may considering the fact that the investigation is going on in connection with Jama P.S. Case No. 60/2025, the respondent No.3 is directed to ensure that proper investigation is carried out in the said case. ( 2026:JHHC:7492 ) 6. This writ application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) P.K.S. Uploaded