Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 17050 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17050 of 2026 R.Vijay ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. State by Inspector of Police, C3 Seven Wells Police Station, Chennai 600079. 2. P.Chiranjeevi Maruthi ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records relating to Crime No.213 of 2025 on the file of the 1st Respondent and quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), for R1 M/s.R.Sindhuja, for R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17050 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the FIR in Crime No.213 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent Police for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296(b) and 351(3) of BNS, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the Court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that the de facto complainant got information that the accused are picking up quarrel with his brother. When he went there, again quarrel developed and the accused picked bricks present there and hit against the de facto complainant and others and also threatened them. Upon the said allegations, the case was registered. It is now submitted that the parties have ironed out their differences between them. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17050 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No.17050 of 2026 stands allowed. The FIR in Crime No.213 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent Police stands quashed. 08-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No PVS To
1. The Inspector of Police, C3, Seven Wells Police Station, Chennai. 2.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17050 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. PVS CRL OP No. 17050 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis