2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3529 BA1 No.744 of 2026 Nasrat Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No.131 of 2026 under Section 3, 5 read with Section 11 of Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, P.S. Kotwali Ranipur, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has falsely implicated in the present case and has been made scapegoat. He submits that there is no recovery from the applicant and there is no independent witness; there is delay of about 4 hours in lodging the FIR. He submits that till date there is no FSL report to prove that the alleged recovered meat is beef. 5. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Nasrat be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 08.05.2026 Arti