Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5067 (AP)

M/s. Pavan Constructions, v. Sri Suresh Kumar

CC/4223/2025 · 2026-07-02

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010718832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4223/2025 Between: 1. M/S. PAVAN CONSTRUCTIONS,, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 3/390, THILAK NAGAR, AKKAYAPALLI, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI VADDEMANI RAMALINGA REDDY, S/O. LATE V. GURIVI REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SURESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 4. SRI A VIJAYA KUMAR REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KADAPA,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. SRI D SRINIVASULU, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER WORKS ACCOUNTS, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for wilfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.26212/2025, dated.23.09.2025 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of Copy of Order in WP.No.26212/2025, dated.23.09.2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3. . The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26212 of 2025, dated 23.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.07.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑