Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50658 (KAR)

SONNAPPA v. KEMPAIAH

RSA/2169/2023 · 2026-01-22

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3975 RSA No. 2169 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2169 OF 2023 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH 2. SMT. CHENNAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O LATE CHIKKAYELLAPPA 3. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKAYELLAPPA 4. SRI. MURALI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKAYELLAPPA 5. SRI. SWAMY @ ANAND AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKAYELLAPPA ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KATTUGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, MANDUR POST BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560 049 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI JAGADEESHA K J., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3975 RSA No. 2169 of 2023 S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVENAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 2. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE DODDAVALLAPPA 3. SRI VENKATESH 50 YEARS S/O LATE DODDAVALLAPPA 4. SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O RANGAPPA D/O LATE DODDAVALLAPPA 5. SMT. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O LATE DODDAVALLAPPA 6. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS D/O LATE DODDAVALLAPPA RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 6 ARE R/AT KATTUGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI MANDUR POST BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560 049 7. SMT. NARASAMMA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS W/O NARAYANAPPA D/OLATE DODDAVALLAPPA 8. SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEAR W/O GANGADHARA D/O LATE DODDAVALLALPPA RESPONDENTS NO.7 AND 8 ARE R/AT THARABANAHALLI VILLAGE CHIKKAJALA HOBLI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3975 RSA No. 2169 of 2023 DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT 562 157 9. THE SPL. LAO VISHWESHWARAIAH CENTER 3RD FLOOR, PODIM BLOCK BENGALURU 560 093 10. THE ESTATE MANAGEMENT UNIT DRDO TOWNSHIP C.P.C.V RAMAN NAGAR BENGALURU 560 93 11. SMT. PILLAMMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH 12. SMT. YASHODAMMA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS W/O VENKATARAJU 13. SRI. SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH 14. SMT. MANJULA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH 15. SMT. PADMA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS D/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH 16. SRI. CHELUVARAJ A AGED 29 YEARS W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH RESPONDENTS NO.11 TO 16 ARE R/AT NO. 604, AMBEDKAR COLONY RAILWAYPARALLEL ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU 560 022 …RESPONDENTS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3975 RSA No. 2169 of 2023 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.03.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.146/2022 ON THE FILE OF VIII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.04.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.528/2000 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 56