Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010672982017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3763/2017 Between: 1. P PURUSHOTHAM REDDY, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, R/O D NO.16- 633/J-3, SRI RAMA NILAYAM STREET, BASINIKONDA, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. N KRISHNA REDDY, S/o. Guruva Reddy, R/o Kitiperi, Chowdepalle Mandal, Chitoor District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Judgment dt.28.04.2017 passed in O.E.P No.6 of 2016 in O.S No.91 of 2014, on the file of II Additional District Judge, Madanapalli, Chittoor District. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 4938 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the orders passed in OEP No.6/2016 dated 28.04.2017 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Madanapalli Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. N PRAMOD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3763/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.04.2017 passed in O.E.P No.6 of 2016 in O.S.No.91 of 2014 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Madanapalli, Chittoor District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that basing upon the instructions, even though there is no interim direction in the Revision Petition, but for one reason or the other the execution proceedings are not completed and not closed. However, if the execution Court passes any further orders in execution petition, the petitioner may be granted liberty to challenge the same. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in the present revision petition. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. However, if any orders are passed by the Execution Court in the execution petition, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same by initiating appropriate proceedings. No costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 18 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3763/2017 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS