Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50630 (KAR)

SRI PRAKASH SHETTY v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER

WP/31092/2025 · 2026-01-27

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4630 WP No. 31092 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 31092 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI PRAKASH SHETTY SON OF LATE KOLLUR SURENDRA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2-24, MAYURA GUEST HOUSE, CAR STREET KOLLUR, NEAR SHRI MOOKAMBIKA TEMPLE, KOLLUR-576220. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER CANARA BANK, SME KUNDAPURA MAIN II BRANCH, KAMATH BUILDING MAIN ROAD, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI-576201. 2. M/S K.S.S.HOTEL, REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR SMT.SHAKILA SHETTY, 3. SMT.SHAKILA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4630 WP No. 31092 of 2025 DAUGHTER OF LATE KOLLUR SURENDRA SHETTY, 4. SMT. SHYAMALA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE KOLLUR SURENDRA SHETTY, RESPONDENT NOS.2, 3 AND 4 ARE RESIDING AT AMBIKA GUEST HOUSE, KOLLURU VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576220. 5. MR. PRADEEP SHETTY, SON OF RAJEEV SHETTY, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOSUR VILLAGE, JADAKAL, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576233. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LATHA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE DTD. 09.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK (ANNX-A) AND ALL MEASURES INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK AGAINST THE PETITIONER, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4630 WP No. 31092 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33