Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15913] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1048/2026
1. Premshankar, S/o Ganesh
2. Chothmal, S/o Ganesh
3. Gokulprasad, S/o Ganesh
4. Murlidhar, S/o Ganesh
5. Gyaneshwar, S/o Ganesh
6. Bhagwandas, S/o Ganesh
7. Jagni Bai W/o Kesrilal, All R/o Khedli Purohit, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota All Through Power Of Attorney Vinod Pareta R/o Kota. ----Petitioners/Revisionist Versus
1. Manoj Kumar Munot, R/o 7-A, Talwandi Kota District Kota.
2. Sub Divisional Officer, Kota District Kota. ----Respondents/Non-Revisionists For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raghav Mishra and Ms. Praveshika Singh for Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC Mr. Dharmendra Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 16/04/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the petitioners may prefer an application before the District Collector, Kota, with respect to land bearing Khasra No.486 situated at Village Tekhda, Patwar Mandal Telgi Arab, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota, under the provisions of Section 88 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, and in the event of any such application being filed, the same be considered in a time bound manner, strictly in accordance with law.
[2026:RJ-JP:15913] (2 of 2) [CW-1048/2026]
2. Taking note of the limited submission so made and without delving into the merits of the matter, the petitioners are granted liberty to file an appropriate application under Section 88 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, before the District Collector, Kota, with respect to land bearing Khasra No.486 situated at Village Tekhda, Patwar Mandal Arab, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota, within a period of two weeks from today, i.e. 16.04.2026. In the event of any such application being filed, along with the certified copy of this order by the petitioners, the District Collector, Kota, is
directed to consider and decide the same by passing a speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law, after taking into account all the obtained facts and circumstances and after granting the affected parties an opportunity of hearing, within a period of six weeks thereafter.
3. It is clarified that the said application be decided independently without being influenced by any proceedings or orders passed earlier.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s application(s) and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said application(s) in a particular manner.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /34