WP No.26303 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.26303 of 2026 and WMP No.28726 of 2026 M/s.Rajammal Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director, Balasubramaniam Raja, No.147, Eswaran Salai, Karapakkam, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Guindy, Chennai. 2. The District Environmental Engineer, Chennai South, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. 3. The Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority, Rep. By its Member Secretary, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st and 2nd respondent Board, relating ot the impugned order in Proc.Nil, dated 26.05.2026 and quash the same and consequentially https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.26303 of 2026 direct the respondents 1 and 2 to process the Application of the petitioner, for CTO-Direct, in Application ID-73969335, without insisting no-objection from the 3rd respondent, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamalesh Kannan For Respondents : Mr.V.Gunasekar Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 and 2 : Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali Govt. Pleader for R-3 * * * * * ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to quash the order dated 26.05.2026 and to direct the first and second respondents to process the application of the petitioner for CTO-Direct, in Application ID-73969335 without insisting on no-objection from the third respondent. 2. We have perused the order dated 26.05.2026, which states that the application filed by the petitioner was scrutinised and after scrutiny, the application has been returned to the petitioner for compliance, with certain requirements as pointed out in the order. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.26303 of 2026 3. Learned counsel appearing for the first and second respondents submitted that if the application is re-presented after curing the defects or the requirements, the same shall be considered on merits and if the application is not re-submitted within a period of thirty days, the same shall be rejected. In view of the aforesaid, we refrain from entertaining this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application stands closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 16.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sra To 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Guindy, Chennai. 2. The District Environmental Engineer, Chennai South, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.26303 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. (sra) 3. The Member Secretary , The Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. WP No.26303 of 2026 16.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis