Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5062 (CHH)

AAYUSH SAHARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13712/2025 · 2026-02-12

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:8195 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13712 of 2025 Aayush Sahare S/o Late Deepak Sahare Aged About 19 Years R/o Village- Mohad, Post- Mathal Dabri, Tahsil- Dongargaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Health And Medical Officer Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Medical Officer Gundardehi, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ankush Soni, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For State : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 13/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.02.16 11:38:27 +0530 2 / 2 respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) for compassionate appointment within a stipulated time frame. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner on any suitable post commensurate with his qualification. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s application/representation (Annexure P-4) for grant of compassionate appointment is still pending consideration before respondent No.3 and therefore a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to take decision on the pending application/representation at the earliest within specified time frame. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to consider and take decision on the pending application/representation (Annexure P-4) submitted by petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen