Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50618 (MAD)

S.GANESHWARI v. The Tahsildar

WP/26883/2026 · 2026-07-10

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26883 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26883 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.29428 of 2026 S.Ganeshwari ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Madathukulam taluk, Tiruppur District. 2. The Inspector of police, Kaniyur Police Station, Tiruppur District. 3. K.Eshwari 4. K.Muthukumar 5. K.Jegadeeshwaran ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records with respect to Na.Ka.No.949/2026/A4 dated 30.06.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Arjun for Mr.J.Prithivi For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel for R1 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Government’s Counsel for R2 ORDER Challenge has been made against the order passed by the first respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26883 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 in Na.Ka.No.949/2026/A4, dated 30.06.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the property in S.No.55/2A2, measuring 0.50 acres in Thungavi Village, Madathukulam Taluk and Kaniyur Sub Registrar Office, Tiruppur District by virtue of release deed dated 27.012014, wherein the respondents 4 to 5 have challenged the validity of the said release deed and claimed rights over the property by filing suit in O.S.No.104 of 2019, which is pending on the file of District Munsif Court, Madathukulam. Pending the said suit, the respondents 3 to 5 have filed writ petition in W.P.No.19385 of 2026 before this Court and obtained an order to repair the underground pipelines running through the subject property with police protection. Based on which, the first respondent passed an order dated 30.06.2026, directing the second respondent to provide protection to undertake repair work. Challenging the said order dated 30.06.2026, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel accepts notice on behalf of first respondent and submitted that as per the order of the first respondent, the entire work has already been completed with the protection of the second respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26883 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. In view of the above, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication and the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The Tahsildar, Madathukulam taluk, Tiruppur District. 2. The Inspector of police Kaniyur police station, Tiruppur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26883 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 26883 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis