Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50605 (MAD)

A.Soukath Ali v. S. Parthiban and 2 others

CONT P/5/2026 · 2026-07-08

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 5 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CONT P No. 5 of 2026 A.Soukath Ali S/o. K.Abdul Hameeth, Thandarai (Village and Post), Kilpennathur (Tk), Thiruvannamalai-Dt ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. S. Parthiban The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies, Thiruvannamalai Region, Thiruvannamalai District 2. Francis Sahaya Arokiya Mary The Deputy Registrar Co Operative Societies, Thiruvannamalai Circle, Thiruvannamalai District. 3. Jeevan Surabi Administrator, The Management of H.H 236 Thandarai Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd, Kilpennathur (Tk), Thiruvannamalai District. ..Contemnor(s) Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the Respondent's for willfully disobeying the orders passed in passed in W.P.No. 7650 of 2025 in order dated 03.07.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 5 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): M/S. L.P.Shanmugasundaram, For Contemnor(s): Ms.A.Suganya, Government Counsel for R1 & R2 M/S.R.Balaramesh, For R3 ***** ORDER This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the Respondent's for wilful disobeying the orders passed in passed in W.P.No. 7650 of 2025 in order dated 03.07.2025. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.The learned Government Counsel for the respondents would submit that they have complied with the directions of this Court by paying a sum of Rs.11,17,670/- and the balance amount is only Rs.75,165/-. 4.However, the said contention was stoutly objected by the learned counsel for the petitioner. According to their Memo of calculation, they are still liable to be paid a sum of Rs.13,61,159/- over and above the amount they received. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 5 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.In contempt jurisdiction, this Court cannot go into the factual aspects. Therefore, the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum by filing a claim petition. 6.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Counsel, this Contempt Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KMI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 5 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. KMI CONT P No. 5 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis