- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3976 RSA No. 1610 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1610 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI S.V. RAMEGOWDA S/O LATE EREGOWDA @ VEEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.132, HULIMAVU, SOMESHWARA LAYOUT, HULIMAVU, BENGALURU-560 076 2. SMT. SHARADAMMA W/O SRI NAGENDRA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO. WARD NO.1, GUNDLUPET TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571 313 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI B R SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI S.V. RAJANNA S/O LATE EREGOWDA @ VEEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT JAKIR HUSSAIN NAGARA, WARD NO.1, GUNDLUPET TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 2. SMT. MANGALAMMA W/O SRI PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3976 RSA No. 1610 of 2024 3. SRI VEERABHADREGOWDA S/O LATE VEEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, DEAD BY LRS 3A. 3B. 4. SAVITHRI W/O LATE VEERABHADREGOWDA VANI D/O LATE VEERABHADREGOWDA SRI SHIVANNA S/O LATE VEEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, DEFENDANTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/OF SIDDARAMANAHUNDI VILLAGE, YADAKOLA POST, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK. 5. SMT. PREMA W/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 6. SMT. CHIKKAMUDDAMMA @ BABY W/O SRI KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, THE DEFENDANTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE R/AT NO.7, 7TH CROSS, HOSABEEDHI, NEAR BUS STAND, KUMBARAKOPPAL, MYSORE-583231 7. SRI CHENNAVEEREGOWDA @ BEEMANNA S/O LATE CHENNAVEEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/OF KUPPEGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK -583231 …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3976 RSA No. 1610 of 2024 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.03.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.128/2019 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.02.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.801/2011 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 59