Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50577 (KAR)

SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. JAMAL

WP/30587/2024 · 2026-01-31

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5425 WP No. 30587 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 30587 OF 2024 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD SHOP NO. 4 AND 5, 1ST FLOOR, INLAND OMATE, NAVABHARATH CIRCLE, MANGALURU 575003. NOW REP BY SBI GIC LTD., 1ST FLOOR, RUKMINI TOWERS, PLATFORM ROAD, NEAR MANTRI MALL. SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560020 REP. BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER. COMPANY IS REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT 1956. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRADEEP B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JAMAL S/O. K. HUSEN, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5425 WP No. 30587 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT H.NO. 2-76, FATHIMA MANZIL, KOMBAGUDDE, VTC-MAJOOR, PO-KAPU UDUPI DISTRICT-574106. 2. NAGAPPA TEGGI, S/O. PAVADAPPA, AGED 46 YEARS, R/AT H. NO. 55/P4, DEVEGOWDA BADAVANE, BELAPU VILLAGE, KAPU TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 574117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH N V.,ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNX-E DATED 21.03.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT, UDUPI ON APPLICATION BEARING NO. 1/2024 FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACT AS PER ANNX-B AND TO REJECT THE IA NO. 2/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 OF CPC READ WITH SECTION 166(3) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5425 WP No. 30587 of 2024 (AMENDMENT ACT 2019) IN MVC NO. 973/2023; ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX-B AND HOLD THAT CLAIM PETITION AS PER ANNX-A IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner, arguing in support of dismissal of the petition, submits that in terms of the memo the parties have settled their dispute in the Lok Adalath. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner is herewith filing the Memo for withdrawal of Petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5425 WP No. 30587 of 2024 As such, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE SA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7