- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1468 RSA No. 2096 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2096 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SMT. THIMAMMA W/O THALUREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/A BOMMENAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SANDEEP S PATIL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE PAREDESHIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 2. SRI SHIVEGOWDA S/O LATE PAREDESHIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 3. SMT SHARADAMMA @ SHANTHAMMA D/O LATE PAREDESHIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1468 RSA No. 2096 of 2023 4. SRI KRISHNEGOWDA S/O LATE PAREDESHIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 5. SRI SHIVALINGEGOWDA S/O PUTTASWAMYGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 6. SRI KRISHNEGOWDA S/O KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 7. SRI PRADEEP KUMAR S/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/A ATTAVARA HOSAHALLI, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 8. SRI RAMEGOWDA S/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AATTAVARA HOSAHALLI, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 9. SRI SURESHA S/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/A ATTAVARA HOSAHALLI, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. 10. SRI HANUMEGOWDA S/O MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A ATTAVARA HOSAHALLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1468 RSA No. 2096 of 2023 DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.08.2023 PASSED IN RA.NO.151/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, HASSAN. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 32