- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:797 WP No. 29924 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.29924 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT CHINNAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, W/O. LATE. KARYAPPA, R/AT FARM HOUSE NO.27, 2. SRI PUTTANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. LATE. KARIYAPPA, 3. SMT DEVAMANI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, D/O LATE MADAPPA ALL ARE R/AT FARM HOUSE NO.27, R/AT CHORANAHALLI, VARUNA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK-570010 PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI.RAVI.P AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O SRI.SRI PUTTANNA R/AT CHORANAHALLI, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:797 WP No. 29924 of 2025 VARUNA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK-570010. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMARA K G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DC OFFICE COMPLEX, MYSURU-570001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU DIVISION, MYSURU-570001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU-570005 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 23.06.2025 AS PER THE ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:797 WP No. 29924 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. 2. The prayer in the writ petition is to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.4 - Tahsildar, Mysore Taluk to consider the representation at Annexure-A given by the petitioner to enter the name of the petitioners in the RTC in terms of the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court in O.S.No.734/2023. 3. Learned High Court Government Pleader however submits that there is no information placed by the petitioners regarding the receipt of the application in the office of the 4th respondent. However, learned High Court Government Pleader submits that liberty may be reserved to the petitioners to give such a representation and if such representation is given, the Tahsildar will be bound to consider the same and pass necessary orders in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:797 WP No. 29924 of 2025 accordance with law within the time frame as provided in the provision. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to file a representation or application before the 4th respondent – Tahsildar, Mysore Taluk seeking entry of their names in the RTC in accordance with law. If such application is filed, the 4th respondent - Tahsildar shall consider the same and pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date when application is filed by the petitioners. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL