K T BHADRAPPA v. DODDAHAIDA S/O KALASA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS., JAVARAMMA
RSA/2102/2023 · 2026-01-27
Ravi V Hosmani
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50561 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50561 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4453 RSA No. 2102 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2102 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN:
K T BHADRAPPA S/O K.S. THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, HALLIMYSORE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 210. …APPELLANT (BY SRI BHARATH K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1. DODDAHAIDA S/O KALASA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.,
JAVARAMMA W/O LATE DODDAHAIDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
2. BHUVANESHA S/O LATE DADDAHAIDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
3. KRISHNA S/O LATE DADDAHAIDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
4. SWAMY S/O LATE DADDAHAIDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4453 RSA No. 2102 of 2023
KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, HALLIMYSORE HOBALI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASANA DISTRICT - 573 210. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.08.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.3/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.146/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 47