- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6706 WP No. 30378 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 30378 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI VENKATESH A S/O SRI ARUMUGAM AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.613, 29TH EAST END MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK BANGALORE SOUTH BENGALURUL-560041. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOWRI SHANKER M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH CORPORATION GREATER BANGALORE AUTHORITY BENGALURU-560078. 2. THE REVENUE OFFICER J P NAGAR SUB DIVISION BANGALORE SOUTH CORPORATION GREATER BANGALORE AUTHORITY BENGALURU-560078. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6706 WP No. 30378 of 2025 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER J P NAGR, SUB DIVISION BANGALORE SOUTH CORPORATION GREATER BANGALORE AUTHORITY BENGALURU-560078. 4. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING J P NAGAR, SUB DIVISION BANGALORE SOUTH CORPORATION GREATER BANGALORE AUTHORITY BENGALURU-560002. 5. SRI MOHAMMED THANVEER S/O LATE C.M. MOHAMMED AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS MANTHARA KABAB MAGIC AT NO.1548/82, EAST END MAIN ROAD 9TH BLOCK, J P NAGAR BENGALURU-560078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIYAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 ENFORCE THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6706 WP No. 30378 of 2025 i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order OR direction directing the Respondent No.1 enforce the order dated 23.07.2025 as per Annexure A. ii) Issue such other order or directions as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and allow this Petition in the ends of Justice and equity. 2. The matter had been mentioned, and a memo was moved seeking for the above petition to be posted for withdrawal. However, no memo of withdrawal has been filed, and no appearance has been made on the part of the counsel for the petitioner. 3. However, taking into account the fact that a memo has been moved for withdrawal of the above petition, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20