SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3539 BA 1 st No.5 5 3 of 2 0 2 6 Rajendra Singh Negi @ Raju ……Applicant Vs. State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. Mr. Devesh Upreti, Ms. Rajni Supyal Latwal, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. In the High Court of Uttarakhand, the present case arises from Bail Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the Applicant – Rajendra Singh Negi @ Raju, who has been accused in Case Crime No.03 of 2026, under Sections 109 (1), 352 of BNS, and under Section 30 of the Arms Act, Police Station Dhaulchhina, District Almora. 4. The facts of the case are that the FIR has been lodged with the averments that my younger brother Arjun Singh had gone to show a Bihari mason for laying the roof of my neighbour late Shri Narayan Singh's house. When my brother Arjun Singh came on the road, Raju alias Rajendra Singh Negi, son of late Dalip Singh of our village started abusing my brother. My brother stopped this person from abusing but he did not listen. Then my daughter-in-law Mrs. Deepa Devi and my nephew Manjeet Singh came to the spot and tried to convince the said Rajendra alias Raju but this person did not listen and continued abusing. Then in the meantime, he fired from his gun from the house, due to which my brother, daughter-in-law and nephew got hit by pellets and got injured. We immediately took them from the spot in a private vehicle to the Primary Health Centre, Maisiya Thana, who have been referred to a higher centre for treatment. It is requested that necessary action be taken against the said person Raju alias Rajendra Singh Negi. 5. Learned counsel representing the Applicant submits for the consideration of the bail that Applicant is in jail since 01.03.2026, and the Applicant has falsely been implicated in the present matter. He further submits that the Applicant has no criminal history. 6. On the other hand, learned State Counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application of the Applicant with the contention that the Applicant has previous criminal history. He further submits that it is a heinous offence. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has not made out a case for bail. Consequently, the bail application of the Applicant – Rajendra Singh Negi, in connection with the Case Crime No.03 of 2026, under Sections 109 (1), 352 of BNS, and under Section 30 of the Arms Act, Police Station Dhaulchhina, District Almora, is hereby rejected. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 08.05.2026 Nitesh/