Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5053 (UTT)

RAJ BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/96/2026 · 2026-01-10

Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:446 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 96 of 2026 10 January, 2026 Raj Bahadur Singh Singh and another ……….Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others ………..Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary and Mr. Navneet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bihst, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble Subh ash Upadh yay, J. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 91(S/S) of 2026 has been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents/State submits that he has no objection to the said prayer made by the petitioners. 3. The submissions of learned counsel for the parties are placed on record. 1 2026:UHC:446 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 09.01.2026 passed in WPSS No. 91 of 2026. ( SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 09.01.2026 Kaushal 2