- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2001 WP No. 29590 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 29590 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. AKRAM S/O MAQBOOL AHAMED AE ABOUT 40 YEARS R/A NO 347, 9TH CROSS BEHIND MADEENA MASEEDI GOUSIYA NAGAR C BLOCK MYSURU 3 570 019 &PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHISHA D J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571 401 3. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 3 571 401 4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION PANDAVAPURA MANDYA DISTRICT 571 404 Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2001 WP No. 29590 of 2025 5. TASILDAR SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571 401 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 22/8/2025 OF THE PETITIONERS AT ANNEXURE-K, K1, K2, K3 TO THE RESPONDENTS NO. 2 TO 5, FOR CHANGE OF KATHA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the name of the petitioner's father has been removed from the revenue records without notice to the petitioner and the name of Mysuru Rajapramukharu has been entered in the revenue records. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that if the name of the petitioner or his father has been - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2001 WP No. 29590 of 2025 removed from the RTC, then the petitioner will have to question the same by preferring an appeal before the Assistant Commissioner invoking Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (8the Act9, for short). 3. At this juncture, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition and file an appeal before the Assistant Commissioner. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner invoking Section 136(2) of the Act, as prayed for. 5. Office to return the original documents/certifies copies, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24