( 2026:JHHC:4997 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11686 of 2025 Munsi Soren aged about 36 years son of Chandan Soren, resident of village-Mahadebpur, P.O. Narottampur, P.S. Pakur (M), District- Pakur, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Senior Advocate : Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. --- 03/19.02.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2025 in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025 registered under Sections 64(1), 351(3), 303(2), 324(2) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution case, which has been lodged after four days of the alleged offence, alleging that the petitioner had entered into the house of the victim who has three children and forcibly committed rape upon her. The learned counsel has further submitted that in the F.I.R. it has been mentioned that the victim had locked the accused in the room from outside and went to call other villagers and in the meantime, the petitioner fled away. The learned counsel submits that victim refused to undergo medical examination and the petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted on 10.10.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the victim is a widow lady. However, it is not in dispute that the victim refused to undergo medical examination. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that neither the petitioner was apprehended on the spot, nor the victim agreed for medical examination, the petitioner above named is ( 2026:JHHC:4997 ) 2 directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner shall not threaten or trouble the victim in any manner. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 19.02.2026 Uploaded on:20.02.2026 Binit/