SURAYA BEGUM AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER NOWSHERA AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/528/2021 · 2026-02-13
Sanjay Parihar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 505 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 505 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 21 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:-CrlM No. 267/2026 in CRM (M) No. 528/2021
Suraya Begum & Ors.
…. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Ch. Mohd. Shabir, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K & Anr.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 23.02.2026
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would not press for recalling of the order dated
13.02.2026. He further submits that he may be granted liberty to question the charge-sheet, in case the same is filed, in accordance with law. His statement is taken on record. Accordingly, this application seeking recalling of the order dated 13.02.2026 is dismissed as not pressed. However, having regard to the submission made at the Bar, that on the strength of FIR No. 0021/2020 in case the same is concluded into the final police report, the petitioners shall be at liberty to question the charge-sheet in accordance with law.
Disposed of as such.
(SANJAYPARIHAR)
JUDGE
JAMMU 23.02.2026 Diksha