- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:350 WP No. 29357 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 29357 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, SON OF LATE THIPPAIAH RESIDING AT BAIYAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU NORTH DISTRICT- 560068 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.D.R.RAVISHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. PRASHANT L KANAL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU- 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:350 WP No. 29357 of 2025 K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 009. 4. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU- 560 064. 5. THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR HUNSAMARANAHALLI CIRCLE, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU- 562 157. 6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT HUNSAMARANAHALLI CIRCLE, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU- 562 157. 7. KRISHNAPPA K B SON OF LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT BAIYAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU- 562 157. 8. NARAYANASWAMY K.B SON OF LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 9. SUBRAMANI. J SON OF LATE K.B. JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.7 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT BAIYAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU- 562 149. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:350 WP No. 29357 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASHING ORDER 24.03.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN RP NO. 100/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE- A., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Senior Counsel Sri.D.R.Ravishankar, appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to raise a challenge to the amendment in Karnataka Act No.6 of 2025 on the ground that a second revision is not permissible in law. Learned Senior Counsel would therefore submit that the petitioner should be permitted to amend the petition. 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, such amendment cannot be permitted. On the other hand, the petitioner may file a fresh writ petition raising a challenge to the amendment. 3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:350 WP No. 29357 of 2025 petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9