Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50441 (MAD)

Manimaran v. The District collector

WP/27338/2026 · 2026-07-15

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27338 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27338 of 2026 Manimaran S/o. Murugesan, 1, Kagguchi, Kagguchi 2, Udhagai, Nilgiris ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector The office of District collector , Tirupur 2. The Revenue Divisional officer The office of Revenue Divisional officer, Pollachi Road, Dharapuram 3. The Tahsildar The office of Tahsildar , Kangayam 4. the Sub registrar the office of Sub registrar , Chennimalai ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to issue patta in petitioner favour for the lands in Survey Nos . 659/B5 and 660/A5 measuring an extent of 4.05 Acres situated at Paranjervali village, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur district based on the petitioners application in Application No. 2026/ 0103/ 32/ 036894 dated 22.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27338 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Ms.Gangeswetha For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt.counsel for R1 to 3 Mr.Dominic S.David, Govt.counsel for R4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 22.06.2026. 2. Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.Dominic S.David, learned Government’s counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 4th respondent. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 22.06.2026 before the 3rd respondent, requesting them to issue patta, pertaining to the subject land, in favour of the petitioner. However, the said application was not at all considered by the 3rd respondent till date. Hence, this petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27338 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner’s application will be disposed of within a period of 2 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 22.06.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 9. Post this matter for reporting compliance on 04.08.2026. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSA Note: Issue order copy on 17.07.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27338 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District collector The office of District collector , Tirupur 2. The Revenue Divisional officer The office of Revenue Divisional officer, Pollachi Road, Dharapuram 3. The Tahsildar The office of Tahsildar , Kangayam 4. the Sub registrar the office of Sub registrar , Chennimalai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27338 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 27338 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis