Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 26605 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26605 of 2026 K.Dillibabu S/O.Late.Kanniyappan Res.at Door No.3/91 Thiruvalluvar street Mannivakkam village Vandalur Taluk chengalpattu District ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District collector Chengalpattu District Chengalpattu
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Divisin Chengalpattu District
3. The Tahsildar Vandalur Taluk chengalpattu District
4. Jeganathan S/o.Kannan Mannivakkam village Vandalur Taluk chengalpattu District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26605 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 the petitioners representations dated 24.4.2026 for cancel the patta No.1535 standing in the name of the fourth respondent, the property comprised in Old Survey No.228/7, New survey No.340/17 situated at Mannivakkam village, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpattu District and consequently issue a fresh patta in favour of the petitioner for his lawful of 3 cents For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Nirmal Kumar for Mr.S.Ramachandran For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt. counsel for R1 to 3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.04.2026. 2. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 24.04.2026 before the respondents 1 to 3, requesting them to cancel the patta, pertaining to the subject land, standing in the name of 4th respondent and issue fresh patta in favour of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26605 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents 1 to 3 till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.04.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26605 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To
1. The District collector Chengalpattu District Chengalpattu
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Divisin Chengalpattu District
3. The Tahsildar Vandalur Taluk chengalpattu District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26605 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 26605 of 2026 13-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis