Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50431 (KAR)

SRI CHANDRASHEKAR v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/27012/2023 · 2026-02-04

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6632 WP No. 27012 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 27012 OF 2023 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SRI CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.205, LIG-3, 9TH BLOCK, SURYANAGARA 1ST PHASE, CHANDAPURA CIRCLE, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE-560099 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UMESH B N., ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KAUVERY BHAVANA, BANGALORE-560009 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PUSHPAKANTHA.,ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 19/12/2022, 21/02/2023 AND 02/03/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, A1 AND A2, AND CONSEQUENTLY TO ALLOT THE VACANT SITE BEARING Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6632 WP No. 27012 of 2023 MIG-I/SITE 1935 SITUATED AT SURYANAGAR, 1ST PHASE, KHB, BANGALORE, IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Direct the respondent to consider his representations dated 19.12.2022, 21.2.2023 and 2.03.2023 vide Annexure-A, A1, and A2 and consequently to allot the vacant site bearing MIG-1/Site 1935 situated at Suryanagar, Ist Phase, KHB, Bangalore, in favour of the petitioner. b. Issue any other Writ or orders/reliefs as deems fit by this Hon’ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the above case in the interest of justice and equity. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representations dated 19.12.2022, 21.02.2023 and 2.03.2023 at Annexure-A, A1 and A2 respectively for allotment of site have not been considered by the respondent. 3. When applications are filed complying with all requirements of law, the same would have to be considered by the respondent and necessary orders passed either accepting or rejecting the request made, in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6632 WP No. 27012 of 2023 either case to be accompanied by reasons. In the present case the representations having been made in the year 2022 and 2023 are yet to be considered by the respondents. 4. In that view the matter, I pass the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is allowed. ii. Respondent is directed to consider the representations dated 19.12.2022, 21.02.2023 and 2.03.2023 at Annexures-A, A1 and A2 and pass necessary orders within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner, the same would have to be considered by the respondent in accordance with the applicable law and procedure. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18