Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50424 (KAR)

KRISHNA G NAYAK v. SHAKUNTALA BAI

RSA/1550/2024 · 2026-01-13

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2080 RSA No. 1550 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1550 OF 2024 (RES) BETWEEN: KRISHNA G. NAYAK S/O GAJANANA NAYAK, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, CATERING WORKS, R/AT SRI. VENKATARAMANA KRUPA, 3RD CROSS, NEHRU NAGAR, NEAR BRUNDAVAN APARTMENT, SAGAR - 577 401. &APPELLANT (BY SRI. KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SHAKUNTALA BAI W/O VENKATESH SHANAI, RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/AT VENKATARAMANA KRUPA, 3RD CROSS, NEHRU NAGAR, NEAR BRUNDAVAN APARTMENT, SAGAR TOWN - 577 401. 1. GEETHA KAMATH W/O DINESH KAMAT, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT MANGALURU - 575 001. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2080 RSA No. 1550 of 2024 2. NAGARAJ SHANAI S/O VENKATESH SHANAI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT DIRECTOR OF INDIAN ACADEMY, SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, SIDDARTH LAYOUT, KARTIGUPPE, EAST, BANSHANAKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 85. 3. LATHA. S KINI W/O SUDHAKARA KINI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT MANGALURU - 575 001. 4. ANITHA SHANAI W/O RATNAKARA KINI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT BENGALURU - 560 001. 5. SUBRAYA SHANAI S/O VENKATESH SHANAI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT BENGALURU - 560 001. &RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.06.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.18/2019 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.02.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.298/2015 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2080 RSA No. 1550 of 2024 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant has filed a Memo stating that Appeal has become infructuous. 2. Taking Memo on record, Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 71