- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2165-DB CCC No. 1220 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1220 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. V. SHOBHA RANI D/O B. VASUDEVARAO AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS WAS WORKING AS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER T. BEGUR GRAM PANCHAYAT NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123 RESIDINGA T NO.116 JAYANAGARA, NELAMANGALA BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI SATISH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI RANDEEP D., I.A.S. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2165-DB CCC No. 1220 of 2025 2. DR. ARUNDHATI CHANDRASHEKAR, I.A.S THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA PANCHAYAT RAJ COMMISSIONERATE AND APPOINTING AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ KALIDAS ROAD GANDHI NAGAR BANGALORE-560009 …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR HAVING WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. NO.11062/2025 DATED 25.07.2025 (ANNEXURE-C) THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2165-DB CCC No. 1220 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging the willful disobedience of the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench to this Court in WP.No.11062/2025 (S-KSAT). The complainant had filed the said petition impugning an order dated 10.03.2025 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal [KSAT] in Application No.629/2025. 2. The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by his suspension from service. This Court had noted that the complainant was suspended on 27.01.2025 and the period of six (06) months for which the complainant was suspended would expire on 26.07.2025. This Court had further observed that if the charge memo is not served on the complainant within a period of six (06) months, the legitimate consequences would follow, and, enure to the benefit of the complainant by grant of appropriate postings, etc. The suspension order is not extended and the complainant has been granted a posting. 3. It is the complainant's case that the posting granted is not appropriate. Clearly, it is a separate cause of action and the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2165-DB CCC No. 1220 of 2025 complainant's grievance relating to posting cannot be considered as a disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. The complaint is accordingly closed. 4. We clarify that this order will not preclude the complainant from availing his remedies if he is aggrieved by the posting order. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12