Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5041 (UTT)

ARJUN SINGH CHHATOLA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/314/2026 · 2026-02-27

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1398 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528 No.314 of 2026 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Prem Prakash Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Naveen Singh Bisht, Advocate for respondent no.2. 2. Present C-528 application is filed with the prayer to set-aside/ quash the impugned charge sheet and the entire proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.60 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Special Sessions Judge, Champawat on the basis of compromise between the parties. 3. Compounding application (I.A. No.1 of 2026) is filed in the matter, wherein it is prayed to compound the offence between the parties. 4. The parties appeared before this Court and were duly identified by their respective counsel. It is submitted that the parties have amicably resolved all disputes between them. Respondent No. 3 has stated that the F.I.R. in question was registered owing to a misunderstanding, precipitated by certain altercations wherein the applicant had reprimanded her. 5. It is jointly submitted by the parties that they have settled their scores. 6. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the compounding application. 2026:UHC:1398 7. Upon a careful appreciation of the statements of the witnesses, this Court is of the opinion that the ingredients of Section 75(1)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 9(f) and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, are not established on the basis of the material placed on record. 8. Hon’ble Supreme Court, in a catena of its judgments, has observed that in cases where because of the compromise arrived at between the parties, possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, the High Court may quash the criminal proceedings as continuation of the same would cause great prejudice and injustice to the accused. 9. Following the aforesaid ratio, present compounding application is allowed. The offences between the parties are permitted to be compounded. As a result, entire proceedings of entire proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.60 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Special Sessions Judge, Champawat, are hereby quashed. 9. C-528 application stands disposed of. ( Alok Mah r a, J.) 27.02.2026 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb73933 98f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB987446351E 4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.02.27 19:18:50 +05'30'