JAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS ZAKIR HUSSAIN MANDAL AND 11 ORS v. NUR SALAM AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/429/2026 · 2026-02-26
Devashis Baruah
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5040 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5040 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010023532026
2026:GAU-AS:3275
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/429/2026 JAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS ZAKIR HUSSAIN MANDAL AND 11 ORS S/O LATE NIHAN ALI, R/O VILL. KACHUMARA NC , P.S. KACHUMARA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. 2: MAHIR UDDIN S/O LATE ABDUL MOTALEB
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHCHARA PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 3: MD. JUL HOQUE S/O LATE ABDUL MOTALEB
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHCHARA PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 4: HUSSAIN ALI BHUYAN S/O LATE NAZAR ALI BHUYAN. RESIDENT OF KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 5: ABDUL KADER BHUYAN S/O LATE FAYEZ ALI BHUYAN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAITAR PS NAGARBERA DIST KAMRUP R ASASM
Page No.# 2/6 6: MUKTABAR HUSSAIN S/O AKKABAR ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KACHUMARA NC. PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 7: HANIF UDDIN S/O LATE ALAL UDDIN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 8: NURUL ISLAM S/O LATE MAHIR UDDIN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 9: LATIF ALI S/O LATE SUKUR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 10: SABAN ALI S/O LATE KAJAM ALI
RESIDENT OF KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM. 11: JASHMAT ALI S/O LATE JURAN ALI BHUYAN
RESIDENT OF KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM. 12: KAJIM UDDIN
Page No.# 3/6 S/O LATE MOGRAB ALI
RESIDENT OF KACHUMARA NC PS KACHUMARA DIST BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS NUR SALAM AND 4 ORS S/O LATE SHARIF UDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KASHIMPUR, P.O.
KACHUMARA, DISTRICT-BARPETA, ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O. AND DISTRICT- BARPETA PIN- 781301 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER CHENGA REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. CHENGA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781305 5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE KACHUMARA P.O. KACHUMARA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78112 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR, MS. P BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. N HAQUE,SC, REVENUE Linked Case : WP(C)/6753/2025
Page No.# 4/6 NUR SALAM S/O LATE SHARIF UDDIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KASHIMPUR P.O. KACHUMARA DISTRICT-BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O. AND DISTRICT- BARPETA PIN- 781301 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER CHENGA REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. CHENGA DIST.
BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781305 4:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE KACHUMARA P.O. KACHUMARA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781127 ------------
Advocate for the applicant(s): Ms. P Borah
Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. N Haque
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Page No.# 5/6
ORDER 27.02.2026
Heard Ms. P Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. Mr. N Haque, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the writ petitioner. 2. This is an application filed by the applicants seeking permission of the Court for being impleaded in the accompanying writ petition taking into account that they are vitally interested in the adjudication of the accompanying writ proceedings. 3. This Court has also taken note of the impugned order in the accompanying writ petition and from the same, it is apparent that the names of some of the applicants are there in the impugned order. 4. Considering the above, it is the opinion of this Court the applicants herein if not necessary parties, but would be proper parties and it would be in the interest of justice that the accompanying writ petition is disposed of in their presence. 5. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands allowed. 6. The applicant Nos.1 to 12 herein are impleaded as respondent Nos.5 to 16 in the accompanying writ petition. 7. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court and the Registry shall on the basis of the present order as well as the memo of parties make necessary corrections in the cause title and update the same in the CIS. Page No.# 6/6
8. The said exercise be done by the learned counsel for the petitioner within 7(seven) days from today. 9. Interlocutory application, accordingly, stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant