Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50388 (KAR)

SRI RANGASWAMAIAH v. SMT BORAMMA

WP/28215/2025 · 2026-02-03

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6149 WP No. 28215 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 28215 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI RANGASWAMAIAH S/O LATE GANGAHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, R/AT SWADENAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TUMAKURU-572104 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT BORAMMA W/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, 2. HANUMAKKA D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT CHOLAPURA BALLAGERE POST HEBBUR HOBLI, HEBBUR POST-572120 TUMAKURU TALUK 3. JAYAMMA D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH W/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT RAYAPURA SIRIVARA POST HEBBUR HOBLI-572120 TUMAKURU TALUK Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6149 WP No. 28215 of 2025 4. DODDAMMAIAH D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH W/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 5. MAHADEVAMMA D/O LATE NANJUNDIAH W/O SRINVIASAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT KODIGENAHALLY KASABA HOBLI GUBBI TALUK-572213 TUMAKURU DISTRICT 6. RAJANNA S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 7. RANGASWAMY S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R1, R4, R6, R7 ARE R/AT SWANDENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK-572104 …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.08.2025, PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT TUMAKURU, PASSED ON IA NO.6 FILED PETITIONER FOR AMENDMENT OF PLAINT UNDER ORDER 6 RULE 17 OF CPC IN RA NO. 132/2019., FOR AMENDMENT OF PLAINT, VIDE ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6149 WP No. 28215 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 27.01.2026, which reads as under: “The petitioner submits that, the R.A.No.132/2019 is disposed of by the judgment dated 13.01.2026. Hence, the above Writ Petition becomes infructuous. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner prays to dispose the above Writ Petition as infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33