Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50381 (KAR)

SMT. REVAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27915/2025 · 2026-01-13

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2002 WP No. 27915 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 27915 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. REVAMMA W/O SAMPANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE, R/AT GOLLARAPALYA VILLAGE SHANUMANANGALA BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT -562 109. &PETITIONER (BY SMT.GIRIJA PATIL,B., FOR SMT.GEETHA A.,ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT- 562 159. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIA]DB NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU -560 001 4. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRID ENTERPRISE LIMITED PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2002 WP No. 27915 of 2025 REG.UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT (ROC) NO.1 MIDFORD GARDEN RD, CRAIG PARK LAYOUT, BENGALURU -560 001. &RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI.P.V.CHANDRASHEKHAR., ADVOCATE FOR R-3; SRI.NITHIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DTD. 06.09.2025 VIDE BEARING NO. LND/CR/965/1999-2000 ANNX- G ISSUED BY R-2 TO THE WRIT PETITION AND BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 06.09.2025 VIDE ANNX-F SAGUVALI CHIT MAY BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.11.2025, seeking leave of this Court withdraw the writ petition. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing this writ petition, the respondent-Tahsildar has issued another endorsement. Therefore, the petitioner may be reserved liberty to question the same. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2002 WP No. 27915 of 2025 3. Placing the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the subsequent endorsement issued by the Tahsildar. 4. Office to return the original documents/certifies copies, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy for the file. 5. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40