2026:JHHC:7293 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2120 of 2026 Malik Ansari @ Abdul Ansari @ Adbul Malik, aged about 32 years, Son of Anayat Ansari, Residents of Village Garh Husir, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, Advocate --- 03/17.03.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2026 in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No. 201 of 2024, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 74, 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, though he has been named in the First Information Report. He has also submitted that there is specific allegation of assault against the Moej Ansari and Minhaj Ansari and they have been granted bail by learned court below vide order dated 06.01.2025. However, it transpired that the bail was granted on the ground that they were in custody since 09.12.2024 and there exists land dispute between the parties. 4. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that other co-accused namely Murshid Ansari, Wajid Ansari and Ejaj Ansari who were similarly situated have been granted bail by co- ordinate bench, yesterday, in B.A. No. 2042 of 2026 vide order dated 16.03.2026 and the petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2026. 2026:JHHC:7293 2 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that a number of co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail as mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is also directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No. 201 of 2024 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 17.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-18.03.2026