- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1476 RSA No. 1504 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1504 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. AKKAMMA DEAD BY LRS VENKATRAMANA DEVADIGA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE AKKAMMA HENGSU, 2. SMT. NARAYANI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, D/O LATE AKKAMMA HENGSU, 3. MR. NAGARAJ DEVADIGA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O SMT NARAYANI ALL ARE RESIDENT OF BELGALKATTE, UPPUNDA VILLAGE, BYNDOORTALUK, PO UPPUNDA U.D …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MANJUNATHA K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MAHABALA SHETTY (DEAD) BY LRS SMT.LEELAMMA SHEDTHI AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, W/O LATE MAHABALA SHETTY Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1476 RSA No. 1504 of 2024 2. SMT. PREMA P SHETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. SRI UDAYA KUMAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 4. SRI VINAYA KUMAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 5. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.2 IS THE DAUGHTER AND NOS.3 TO 5 ARE SONS OF LATE MAHABALA SHETTY ALL ARE RESIDENT OF DISHA NILAYA, CHAMTE HARLU, UPPUNDA VILLAGE, BYNDOOR TALUK, U D. PO UPPUNDA-576214 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF DISMISSAL OF R.A.NO.41/2020 DATED 04.04.2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA, ON THE FILE OF I.A.NO.4 FILED BY THE APPELLANTS UNDER ORDER XXII RULE 3 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE FOR BRINGING THEM AS LRS OF DECEASED PLAINTIFF IN O.S.NO.197/1989 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1476 RSA No. 1504 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for V time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 73