- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:670 WP No. 28304 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 28304 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MR. SANDEESH SHENOY S/O VITTAL DAS SHENNAY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 1-175/9, SHANTHA DURGA, SHIVAGIRI ROAD, BHASKAR COLONY, HOSABETTU, KULAI, MANGALURU - 575026 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GUBBI SWAMY S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CANARA BANK HAMPANKATTA BRANCH LIGHT HOUSE HILL ROAD HAMPANKATTA MANGALURU - 575 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER SRI DEVESH PRATAP SINGH 2. M/S TEJAS DUCTS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO. 400-B1 DOOR NO. 6-252/3 NEW KARAVALLI ALE KIADB, BAIKAMPADY Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:670 WP No. 28304 of 2025 MANGALURU - 575 011 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS SMT. MAMTHA DAS SRI SANDESH SHANOY SRI DHEEAJ PRABHU 3. SMT. MAMTHA DAS W/O MOHAN DAS, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 2-7B/16 KUTTIPALKE, AMRUTHNAGAR VAMANJOOR MANGALURU - 575 028. 4. SRI DHEERAJ PRABHU S/O SRI DINESH PRABHU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT KADRI MANGALURU - 575 028 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 31.07.2025 PASSED BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU IN O.A.NO. 800/2022 AT ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE PETITION AS AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:670 WP No. 28304 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition stating that the petitioner filed this instant writ petition for setting aside the order dated 31.07.2025 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I at Bengaluru in O.A.No. 800 of 2022. After filing the said writ petition, other respondents have cleared the entire amount due to respondent No.1 Bank in one time settlement scheme. Under the circumstances, the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV