Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5036 (JHR)

FAYHAD SK @ GINNI @ FARHAD SHAIKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11814/2025 · 2026-02-20

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5195 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11814 of 2025 --------- Fayhad Sk. @ Ginni @ Farhad Shaikh aged about 35 years, S/o-Abdul Sk. @ Abud Shaikh, resident of Village-Harihara, P.O. Gondhaipur, P.S.-Pakur (Muffasil), District- Pakur (Jharkhand). ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Md. Yasir Arafat , Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sushma Aind, A.P.P. For the informant : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate --------- 03/Dated:-20.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 109(1), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.237/2025 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 15.10.2025; as such, he may be released on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation against the petitioner and the stage of trial, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage, however, petitioner may renew its bail application after framing of charge. 6. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 20, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 24.02.2026