Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50359 (KAR)

SRI NARASEEYAPPA H D v. SRI MANJUNATH

CCC/1244/2025 · 2026-01-23

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3891-DB CCC No. 1244 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1244 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI NARASEEYAPPA H.D. S/O LATE DURGAPPA AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT HANCHIHALLLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 129 2. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O LATE MALLAIAH AGE ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT CHUNCHENAHALLLI VILLAGE HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI YOGESH V. KOTEMATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI MANJUNATH THE TAHSILDAR KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 129 …ACCUSED Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3891-DB CCC No. 1244 of 2025 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED/ RESPONDENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, SINCE THEY HAVE FAILED TO OBEY AND IMPLEMENT THE ORDER DATED 21.04.2025 IN W.P. NO.8632/2025 (KLR-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-C PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 21.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.8632/2025 (KLR-RES). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3891-DB CCC No. 1244 of 2025 2. In terms of the said order, the accused was directed to consider the complainants' request for entering their names in the revenue records, in accordance with law. 3. A compliance affidavit has been filed which indicates that the complainants' request was considered and an endorsement dated 02.01.2026 has been issued, inter alia, stating that the names of the complainants cannot be entered in the RTC record in view of the pendency of the suit bearing O.S.No.178/2023, wherein interim order has been granted. The fact that the stay has been granted is also reflected in the Bhoomi software, thus it does not permit any entry in the katha. 4. In view of the above, no proceedings for contempt of Court are required to be initiated. 5. The complaint is, accordingly, closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE KMV/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12