Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50349 (MAD)

A.Maruthai Gounder v. Balakrishnan

WMP(MD)/4867/2026 · 2026-07-09

K Surender

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WMP (MD),No.4867 of 2026 in REV. APLW (MD) SR.No.13431 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WMP (MD) No.4867 of 2026 in REV. APLW (MD) SR. No.13431 of 2026 A. Maruthai Gounder, S/o. Andisamy @ Andi Gounder, Maamarathupatti, Sukkampatti Post, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District – 624 801. … Petitioner / Review Applicant / Third Party Versus 1.Balakrishnan, S/o. Mariyappa Gounder, Mamarathupatti, Sukkampatti, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. … 1st Respondent / Petitioner 2.The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.Taluk Surveyor, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. … Respondents 2 to 3 / Respondents Prayer in WMP (MD) No.4867 of 2026: Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to grant leave to file review challenging the original order passed in the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP (MD),No.4867 of 2026 in REV. APLW (MD) SR.No.13431 of 2026 Writ Petition in W.P.(MD). No.36551 of 2025 dated 02.01.2026. Prayer in REV. APLW (MD) SR. No.13431 of 2026: Review Application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.,) and Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C., praying to Review the judgment passed in W.P. (MD). No. 36551 of 2022, dated 02.01.2026. For Petitioner/Review Applicant : Mr. Muthupandian, for Mr. B. Azhagesh O R D E R This Writ Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to grant leave to file review challenging the original order dated 02.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD). No.36551 of 2025. 2. Though the review applicant is an affected party, but, he was not impleaded as a party in W.P.(MD). No.36551 of 2025. 3. A perusal of the order passed in said writ petition reveals that notices have to go to the parties concerned. For the said reason, the Review Application does not deserve any consideration. Hence, the Writ Miscellaneous Petition is also liable to be dismissed. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP (MD),No.4867 of 2026 in REV. APLW (MD) SR.No.13431 of 2026 4. However, this Court is of the considered view that if the review applicant is so advised, he is always at liberty to approach the competent authority in the manner known to law. 5. In view of the above, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the Review Application in REV. APLW (MD) SR. No.13431 of 2026 is also rejected at the SR stage itself. 09-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No klt To 1.The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. 2.Taluk Surveyor, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP (MD),No.4867 of 2026 in REV. APLW (MD) SR.No.13431 of 2026 K.SURENDER, J. klt WMP (MD) No.4867 of 2026 in REV. APLW (MD) SR. No.13431 of 2026 09-07-2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis