Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5599 RSA No. 1871 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1871 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI MANJUNATH, S/O ASHWATHANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NIDAGHATTA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130. …APPELLANT (BY SRI B SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1.
SMT. KANTHAMMA, W/O T GOPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
2.
SRI ASHWATHNARAYANA S/O LATE BYATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
3.
SRI SATHYANARAYANA S/O LATE BYATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT NIDAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5599 RSA No. 1871 of 2022
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.04.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.25/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.01.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.26/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MALUR.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for eighth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 57