SMT. PARVATHAMMA v. SRI. KANYAKAPARAMESHWARI CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
WP/28575/2024 · 2026-01-07
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50310 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50310 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:900 WP No. 28575 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 28575 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE PAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
2.
SMT. P USHA W/O PRASAD AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT No.5204, 2ND FLOOR, 5TH BLOCK, ANRIYA DWELLINGTON APARTMENTS RMV II STAGE, DOLLARS COLONY BENGALURU 560094
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRASHANTH H S., ADV.) AND:
1.
SRI. KANYAKAPARAMESHWARI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD K R CIRCLE MYSURU 570001 REP. BY ITS MANAGER
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:900 WP No. 28575 of 2024
2.
THE AUTHRORIZED OFFICER SRI KANYAKAPARAMESHWARI CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD K R CIRCLE MYSURU 570001
3.
SRI B R NAGESH S/O SRI B S RANGANATHA SETTY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT No.63, 2ND MAIN 1ST CROSS, 4TH STAGE T K LAYOUT MYSURU 570009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S.MAHENDRA, ADV. FOR R1 & R2, SRI. V.SRINIVAS, ADV. FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT R-1 TO ACCEPT THE BALANCE AMOUNT OF RS.
21,48,276/- (RUPEES TWENTY ONE LAKHS FORTY EIGHT THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX ONLY) ALONG WITH INTEREST FROM 30.11.2019 AS DIRECTED BY THE HONBLE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL IN S.A NO. 532/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND AFFIRMED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P NO. 19067/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-M VIDE ITS ORDER DTD 18.11.2021 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:900 WP No. 28575 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB