- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:328 WP No. 27193 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 27193 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIYELLAPPA S.V. S/O LATE PATEL VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT SRIRAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 560 088. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIKANTH BADARADINNI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RE/BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 009. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:328 WP No. 27193 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK (YELAHANKA), YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO.4/THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, TO CONSIDER THE RE-PRESENTATIONS (ANNEXURE- F3) SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 17.02.2025 EXPEDITIOUSLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner is seeking directions to the Tahsildar, Bengaluru North Taluk, to consider the representation given by the petitioner at Annexure-F series, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:328 WP No. 27193 of 2025 despite an order being passed by the Tahsildar at Annexure-E dated 04.04.2024, rejecting the claim of the petitioner. 3. There is substance in the contention of the learned Additional Government Advocate, it is seen from the documents produced by the writ petitioner that earlier, the petitioner's sons had filed writ petition No.23079/2021 seeking directions to the Tahsildar to rectify the alleged mistakes in the RTC. This Court disposed of the writ petition by order dated 31.05.2022, directing the Tahsildar to consider the grievance of the petitioner therein and also take into consideration all the documents of the petitioner in support of their claim and pass necessary orders. Accordingly, the Tahsildar passed an order in proceedings bearing No.RRT(H)CR:962/2023-24 dated 04.04.2024 rejecting the claim of the petitioners. 4. That being the position, the petitioner cannot be permitted to give further representations to the Tahsildar. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the order passed by the Tahsildar, the avenue open for the petitioner is to approach the Assistant Commissioner raising a challenge to the order passed by the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:328 WP No. 27193 of 2025 Tahsildar. It is also seen that the private respondents who are parties in the order passed by the Tahsildar are not made parties in these proceedings. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the order passed by the Tahsildar before the Assistant Commissioner in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of two weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19