1 2026:CGHC:8192 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2408 of 2025 1. Ajay Kurrey S/o Shri Dil Singh Kurrey Aged About 32 Years Post- Constable- Driver (Mt), Posted At Bilaspur, Resident of Tifra, Nilyam Police Colony, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (CG) ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (CG) 3. Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, New Raipur, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Superintendent Of Police- Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (CG) 5. Joint Director Accounts, Pension Treasury Department, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ajay Kumarani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 13/2/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following reliefs:- SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.02.16 11:02:44 +0530 2 “10.1.This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to directed the respondent authorities to call service records, pertaining to the instant matter. 10.2. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be please to issued writ of ‘Mandamus’, direct the respondent no.1, 2, 3 and 4 to pass orer/direction for stopping/discontinuing payment of ‘Medical Allowance’. 10.3. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be please to issue appropriate writ, directing the respondent to decide petitioner’s representation dated 19/12/2024 (Annexure P/1) forthwith or in some time frame. 10.5. That, any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper together with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has submitted representation dated 19.12.2024 before the respondent No.4 praying for discontinuance of medical allowance to the petitioner, however, till date no decision is taken on it by respondent No.4. Therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.4 to take decision on petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2024, Annexure P-1, expeditiously. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that as petitioner is only praying for a direction to respondent No.4 to take decision on his pending representation, he is having no objection in grant of such relief. 3 4. Heard learned counsel for respective parties and perused the documents annexed with writ petition. 5. Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of case, limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, which is not opposed by learned counsel for respondent-State, without commenting anything on merits of petitioner's case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider and decide representation of petitioner dated 19.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-